Brownshirts and the Long Knifes or History Repeating

August 27, 2009

Some  issues with the Brown Shirt’s seem to be repeating themselves.  Is this just coincidence or human nature.  Whatever the cause is attention to details and possibilities need to be carefully scrutinized.

First, I looked at a story concerning the brownshirts and the day of the Long Knives.

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/triumph/tr-roehm.htm

The History Place

The Triumph of Hitler.

“Many of the working-class men who made up the SA truly believed in the ‘socialism’ of National Socialism and wanted tograb their share of Germany’s wealth, at the expense of someone else, and if necessary by force.”

“The Army agreed to provide weapons and transposrts, but would remain in their barracks and let the SS handle things.”

“By June 25, the German Army had been placed on alert.  All leaves were canceled and the troops were confined to barracks in accordance iwth the secret Himmler agreement.”

Believing that he was in danger of losing everything, Hitler sent Goring back to Berlin and authorized him to begin plans to put down the SA and the conservatives.  Himmler’s SS was also put on full alert.”

“SS  execution squads along with the Gestapo and Goring’s private police roared through the streets hunting down SA leaders and anyone else on the prepared enemies list (later called the Reich List of Unwanted Persons).”

” Kurt von Schleicher, former Chancellor of Germany and one-time master of political intrigue, who had helped topple democracy in Germany and put Hitler in power.  He was attempting a political comback, possibly at Hitler’s expense.  He was gunned down in his home along with his recently-wed wife.”

“…seventy-seven had indeed perished.”  

“If anyone reproaches me and asks why I did not resort to th eregular courts of justice, then all I can say is this:  In this hour I was responsible for the fate of German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people!” 

“The Brownshirts ceased to be a threat to Hitler and over time all but disappeared into the regular Army after Hitler re-introduced military conscription.”

Yes, the above was one method of consolidating power.  Treachury, piousness, deceit, power, murder, mayhem, debotchery, sex, lust, ambivolence, and of course greed.  What more could you want.  A football game or a rugby game.  Some would say their is no difference.  An internal civil war which echoes across the borders.  The first to go were the homosexuals, and the leaders.   The pawns were left to themselves.  However, the pawns were the initial instigators of the destruction.  The brownshirts.  Were they acting in defence or were they just hulligans.  Were they social changers or disturbers of the peace.  Were they thugs or forceful enforcers of the norms of a civil society.  Are their any current countries which are looking like this. 

Heated arguments between the President and/or leader/Secretary of a department.  (Obama and cabinet leaders.)  Killing to finalize the enforcement of a rule.   (War of the Roses, between the House of Stuart and the House of Windsor which continues to this day.)  Not wearing clothes which everyone can tolerate (no belt on a pair of pants so they bag to the knees).

Can the working-class believe in socialism or health care.  Is this trying to grab a piece of the wealth of a country at the expense of the country or is this at the expense of someone else.  Germany did not have that much wealth at that time but was getting more prosperous.  Was the capitalists class withholding medical comforts or health benefits so they could get further ahead.

Do we need a preventative law which says soldiers cannot be detained in their barracks without any cause.  What is to prevent this from happening again.  Would the deployment of seven out of ten aircraft carriers to the other side of the world in essence be the same creation as isolation in barracks.  They are out of the way and cannot fight the opposition in time. 

Can a middle of the road liberal fight conservatives and ultra liberals at the same time.  After all, does this really mean their is no middle ground.

Airlines have an enemies list.  If an enemies list which contains radio talk show hosts, should this be a warning that political problems might be melding out of control.  Can a radio talk show host really be on a List of Unwanted Persons.  Great Britain seems to think so.  Is something internal happening that no one really knows about.

Political people or prosecutors dying for unapparent reasons.  Should we be alerted when this happens.  Should this be a National Police Investigation or a Local or State Police Investigation. 

When Nixon said he was the law was this just a repeat of Hitler’s speech  or was this really a notice that inside forces were at work beyond his control which could have even involved the judicial branches. 

Brownshirts, when worn at Halloween was this a code word to internal political unrest or uncertainty in the Monarchy.  Was this really a statement of rebellion or a code word to signify unrest in the Queens Court.  Afterwords we saw waving of flags of the House of Stuart and not from the House of Windsor at Queen Elizabeth’s latest birthday celebration.

When we have a rogue element capture three SCUD missiles on the high seas but they are not white which would be the required color for a sea based missle something is not right.  Curiously the missles were taken from a $2 million load of logs off of a rogue vessle.  This vessel traveled through the English Channel which is 23 miles at its widest point and it could not be visually seen passing through and all of the satellite detection was turned off.  On top of the White Cliffs of Dover I myself was able to see France.  Is the eyesite of Englishmen not that good any more.Is there a problem.   Where is the security.  Any stealth ships available.  Were all of the countries satellites out of commission.

If the three nuclear weapons are in Virginia who has those now.  Are there any rogue elements in the United States which are trying to grab power.  Do they think they are defending the United States or are they trying to defend their territory as they previously had under another administration.  The SS were loyal to Hitler and the SA were loyal to Rohm.  The military or army was loyal to yet another facton or government leadership.  With a yet unsolved mystery of a birth certificate are some elements of the military loyal to other forces which they do not know they should be loyal to.  Are they loyal to the Constitution and until the resolution of the birth certificate they cannot be loyal to the President but they are holding back because they must be loyal to either their governor or the People.

What is going on? Can anyone really answer this question with definity.

Advertisements