President Obama steps down to Chairman of UN Security Council Post

November 1, 2009

President Obama on November 2nd, 2009 has been forced to step down as President of the United states of America. 

His post for being the Chairman of the United Nations Security Council post will last one month.  Mr. Obama will resume his duties as President of the United states of America following his one month tenure with the United Nations. 

During this time, as per the United states Constitution, Vice President Biden will be the acting President and will assume all roles as signing of bills and as the Commander in Chief of all Armed Forces of the United states and of the United states Navy. 

This action has not been done previously by any acting President but the United states Constitution mandates the procedure for a President who assumes another post by any other foreign nation or organization such as the United Nations. 

Normally Congress and only Congress would have the power to acknowledge and permit a seated President from accepting and acting in another United states government post.  However, since the post has not been authorized by the Congress this thus means that Mr. Obama must and has given up his duties as President. 

Normally the President would appoint an Ambassador to fill this post.  Interviews for acceptance and acknowledgement of skills by Congress must be made.  Congress must approve all Ambassadors except when Congress i s not in session then the President can appoint an Ambassador to fill the post until Congress next comes into Session.

Mr. Obama, I hope you enjoy your stay at the United Nations and enjoy New York at the same time.

Perhaps the Queen of England may get upset at a President or other head of state being able to direct her troops at will. 




Congressional Act required for Obama to Receive Nobel Peace Prize

October 12, 2009

President Obama must receive permission from Congress in order to receive and accept the Nobel Peace Prize.  Otherwise he is breaking the U.S. Constitution, again.

Article I, Section 8.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

From Bloomberg/Yahoo:


There were 205 names submitted for this year’s prize, the highest number in the award’s history.  The winner is selected by a committee of five people elected by the Norwegian parliament.  The prizes for literature, chemistry, medicine and physics, are picked by the Stockholm-based Nobel Foundation.

So what the above is indicating is:  Since the Norwegian Parliament has established the committee by election the award is coming actually from the Sovereign State of Norway and not from the Nobel Prize Committee.  Any “present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State” then must be approved by Congress first in order for the President of the United States to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. 

This is simple basic and to the point.  Now let’s make sure that Congress does indeed pass a resolution which specifically states that President Obama is able to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.  He cannot accept the Nobel Peace Prize without first receiving permission from Congress.

On the other hand, I do not understand why someone would be receiving a Peace Prize for 11 days in office.  This actually sounds like a payoff to me.  All of the other recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize have been Democrats.  Even when President Reagan created the greatest Peace in the world by “tear down this wall”  between the two Germanys no Peace Prize was forthcoming. 

Does a President really need to receive the embellishments of a foreign country in order to establish justice for the United states.  I do not think so.  So perhaps the Nobel Peace Prize is just a cover to receive a payoff and a bribe. 


Vaccination H1N1 Shot by Police Unconstitutional

October 7, 2009

We do not have an America Police force.  That is specifically Unconstitutional.  Only the Senate can wage war and not the President.  Only the Governor’s can invite the United States military into a state.  The President can only order the Military into a state to

 Article I, Section 8. 

 The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water:

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years:

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; …

I do not remember the Congress giving Obama the authority to round up citizens.  I do not see any insurrections from the citizens.  That is the only part here which specifically addresses the flue vaccinations in the slightest.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.


 Amendment III

 No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. 

 or likewise

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 or likewise

 Amendment V

 No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 or likewise

 Amendment VIII

 Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 or likewise

 Amendment IX

 The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

 Back off Jack.  You’re violating my Constitutional Rights.  Since you are acting illegally according to the Constitution then you no longer have rights delegated from the Constitution.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.      

 Show me the court order.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.      

 That is cruel and unusual punishment.  I demand my rights as a free citizen of the United states of America.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

 Sticking that needle in me is tantamount to excessive bail and excessive fines being inflicted.  By definition if you stick that needle in me I am being “inflicted”.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

 When did Congress pass this law.  What is the number of the bill.  When was it signed.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.      

Congress did not declare an “Insurrection”.  Only Congress has this power to declare an “Insurrection”.  The President does not have the Power to declare an “Insurrection”.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.        

I am going back into my house.  You are not to follow because I am not going to quarter you in my house.  That would be Unconstitutional.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

 You’re in my house.  Show me the law where it says that the Senate has declared “War”.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

What deems “Probable Cause” that you have entered my house.  Where is the Grand Jury indictment showing any relevancy of Probable Cause.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

What rules has Congress made concerning my Capture or Reprisal.  Only Congress can make these laws.  The President does not have this Power.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.  

Are you a medical doctor.  Show me your credentials.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

National Police do not have a right to vaccinate me.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

Canada does not require mandatory vaccinations.  We never do something which Canada does not do.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

If that does not work then say:  “All hail the Obama Nation.  Put her right here!!”  OR  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.


Obama Unconstitutional UN Chairman Security Council

October 7, 2009

Wow!! Obama must be super great. He is volunteering to be the United Nations Security Council Chairman for a month. Just think. The first President who will chair this position. Wow. Such energy and stamina. This is impressive.
But. It is Unconstitutional.
Article I, Section 9.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Obama, just so you do get this. The United Nations is considered to be a foreign state.

Now, for the Emolument part. If you receive non-compensatory rewards you will also be receiving payment for services rendered. See again the Federalist Papers. The objective of the President’s compensation remaining level and unchanged is to reduce the possibility of corruption or the taking of bribes. This is not particularly of others but of Congress as well. If a signing of a piece of legislation and an increase of compensation was included this would also be considered as a legal bribe. Restricting this during a term restricts the possibility of influence be the holders of the purse. Likewise, guaranteeing the compensation to remain on an even keel would increase the warranting of political suasion from Congress also. With a basketball player you want them running. If they are disagreeable and you want them to increase your solution is to fire, bench, or a restriction or fine. However, with the Office of President the players incentive or restriction is not to be adjusted. The people would be the prodding force in this case. A President would not run for President if not for the display of energy and the need for popularity and the need for changes. The need for change is the motivating factor and not the need for compensation. (See Alexander Hamilton’s arguments in the Federalist Papers No. 70-78.)
Did I also not get the first part where the Consent of the Congress must be mustered first. The United Nations Security Council Chairmanship is indeed an Office.
So now let’s go to Article II, Section 1.
{In Case of Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inabilty to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.}*
*Then see the twenty-fifth Amendment because the above was changed. The 25th Amendment basically says that for a time the Vice President would have to Act as the President.
If the President is in another Office then the Vice President would have to act as the President. The Vice President would not be the President but merely would just Act as the President. Thus the Vice President would be the Commander In Chief. The Vice President would sign all incoming bills and do other tasks like receiving Ambassadors and other foreign heads of state.
The restriction here has been chronicled previously by Alexander Hamilton in his Federalist Papers #70. The President is to have fewer powers than the Queen/King of England. Whereas the King could call forth and establish wars the President could only direct the Military. The establishment of war is the strict duty of only the Senate.

Article I, Section 8.
The Congress shall have Power… To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water:
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to the Use shall be for a longer
Term than two Years:
To provide and maintain a Navy:
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasion;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the Untied States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline by Congress….
All of the rules above a King is required to do. In England a further restriction has been given to the King in that the funding of the Military is for a one years period of time. (This subject has also been addressed by the writings in the Federalist Papers.) A short restriction of time in funding restricts the power of waging war by a monarch. But a two year period of funding raises continuity of mustering troops. This is the one difference between the United States and England where the President is not as restricted as in England. But this is only as concerning the Military. The holder of the purse can have extreme restrictions when it comes to an energetic Monarch or Supreme Magistrate.
See Article II, Section 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the Untied States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Department, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law; but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

So simply put. The President can appoint while the Senate is out of Session. Currently the Senate is in Session. Therefore President Obama cannot appoint himself during the time which the Senate is in Session. Nor can Mr. Obama appoint himself because the Constitution clearly states the President can appoint positions of other Inferior Offices which the Senate has previously deemed to be minor. This deeming of Appointment thus also cannot be an Appointment of himself. Neither has the Senate authorized nor does the President have the Power to Appoint himself to the Position or Office.
If this were the case however, then the President would have greater powers than the King/Queen of England. He would have the power not only to be the Commander in Chief of the Military forces of the United States but also he would have the Power to be the Commander in Chief of the English Military. His vote as Chairman of the United Nations Security Council would give him the authority to put British forces under his direction. Neither would this be tolerated by the British Parliament but presumably it would not be tolerated by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth. The once Colonies commanding the Forces of the British Crown. It will not happen.
Restrictions and Control of Authority were built into the Constitution on purpose. In some respects also a Governor of New York has more power than the President. The more directly involved with the People the greater the Power vested should be instilled. The higher the level of Power the higher the degree of secondary approval of Power is required. The Senate is the true restricting force here. Approval to act with Power and the restriction of Power is Candidly provided for in our Constitution.
We did not break away from England just to have someone later usurp our restrictions and controls so we would be like a monarchy. But instead a monarchy is set up specifically to not act like a Republic and thus also a Republic cannot function properly as a Monarchy. Still today England does not want to be a Republic. (See House of Stuart Society mission statement.) Part of the House of Stuart (white rose) Mission Statement is to further the cause of returning the House of Stuart monarchy and pushing aside the House of Windsor (red rose) and in also maintaining a Monarchy and not to establish a Republican form of government.
Mr. Obama I can applaud you for your energy. But Mr. Obama this is not and never will be a Monarchy. A Monarch does have the capability to act fast and very decisively. But a Republican form of government is very restrictive. However, Mr. Obama, I hope you do realize the Senate after the bombing of Hawaii did in fact act precisely and forthrightly by declaring war the next day. Unity of purpose and direction of zeal in times of emergencies is not a difficulty historically for the Senate. They have acted quickly and swiftly in the past and they will act promptly in the future. Put your trust in our Constitution. It has worked and it will continue to work.

Elizabeth Campbell and Viaduct/Tunnel Law Suite

September 18, 2009

The Viaduct is not dead.  Or at least not as of yet.  A law suite has been filed by Elizabeth Campbell according to her supporters.  This is in the process of being verified.  However, I had knowledge that this was going to happen two months ago.  The only delay was in the acquisition of funds for the lawsuite.  Stay tuned as to exactly what the specific details are.  Will be getting this information from Elizabeth Campbell as soon as I am able to contact her.

The stigma of the lawsuite should be that an environmental impact statement has not been filed for the Tunnel as of yet.  The Tunnel project has been separated into many different parts so that the necessity for a large Environmental Impact Statement is lessened.  This might be strategic on the construction of the Tunnel but it violates the spirit of the law.  A correction in this endeavor needs to be upheld and thus stop the progress of the building of the Tunnel until a correct and complete Environmental Impact Statement can be completed and evaluated by Federal Authorities and others who would need to make evaluations.

But is this the part of the lawsuite which is being filed.  Stay tuned for complete details on this obvious controversy.

SR 520 construction may be dependent upon these determinations and findings.  Financing of both are tight and could be flipped at any time.  Who is responsible for what and when still needs to be answered.  Again, the costliest roads are being played with.  Your money is at stake again. 

Either through politics or legal maneuvering.

Obama says U.S. not in Bankruptcy and indirectly proves Birth Certificate Issue still a Valid Question

September 12, 2009

With President Obama stating in his speach to the join session of Congress two days ago that if the health bill does not pass then the United States will have to file for “bankruptcy”.  What does this mean.

If we are not in bankruptcy as the above wording does positively indicate then we are out of bankruptcy.  If we were in bankruptcy then we would be dictated by a democratic or a national socialist agenda.  With not being in bankruptcy we according to our constitution must be governed by republican ideals and not democratic ideals.  And by republican vs. democratic I am not refering to a party but rather a style of government.

Under the original constitution and under a republican form of government the ideal of the constitution can be enforced.  The qualification of being a natural born citizen and proving the qualifications of such as are required.  Without being a qualified President the duties or “Acting as President” transfer to the Vice President which is Vice President Obama.

If we are in bankruptcy then we would be governed by the bankruptcy courts or the holders of credit which would be the European bankers, the Illuminaty and the Chinese government.  Unfortunately a government run by creditors would be adversarial to the continuance of a republic because this would be counter to the bankers profit motives and thus also resulting in being counter to american citizens.  As  a United States citizen we do not have a choice in the matter but as an american citizen we do have a choice in the matter.

The “You Lie” comment on the floor of the joint session of Congress was both enlightening and refreshing to hear.  We need more displays of Congressmen truly expressing their opinions and beliefs.  Only after “True Confessions” and of course balancing the budget can America heal itself and become an enduring republic once again.   

Politics and a little economic stimulus can go hand in hand if developed properly and to the goals of the citizenry.   

Maybe what our economy needs is a little bit of alternative politics instead of alternative energy.  Or perhaps the definition of alternative energy is alternative politics.  Keep that political energy going but in the direction of the american citizens benefit.

Rep Jim McDermott Town Hall Meeting answered one question

September 3, 2009

On September 1, 2009, Representative Jim McDermott of the 7th Congressional District in Seattle, Washington on the Campus of the University of Washington at Meany Hall for the Health Care Town Hall Meeting only took one, yes, 1 question.

How do I know this.

Questions which were gathered were on 3 X 5 inch cards and Mr. McDermott was given questions on 5 X 7 inch cards.  I was in the front row.  He read about four and answered four to the audience. 

Many questions from the audience of about 800+ were asked.  But, and this is the reason why I say but, there was a code to who was supposed to be picked for the questions which Mr. McDermott would answer.  A combination of a Nazi 45 degree raised hand and a communist raised hand was the signal.  A closed fist and a Nazi open hand was the singled.  But instead of being an outstretched open hand the first two fingers were out and the last two fingers were tucked under.  Simplistic yet unsuspecting.  They also had three cards with them instead of only the one 3 X 5 card which were handed out outside to the audience line they the questioners had 5 X 7 inch cards as well and three cards each.  I am assuming this would be just in case the questions had already been asked by someone else. 

The surprising aspect of the brownshirt technique here for occupying time was that after the question was asked the questioner would walk outside to the lobby area and leave.  Normally someone would wait to ask the question and then leave but leave to their seat.  These people left not to their seat but to the outside of the back doors.  There was a set of mikes on both sides of the aisles as well so no excuse here.    

Heckles were plentiful during the initial history comments of where we are in the health care process.  This was obviously set up as a repeat of the Nazi Brownshirts technical to intimidate and disorient other prospective hecklers.  Was most liberals do not realize is that conservatives want to hear both sides of an debate and determine their final decision on all facts and circumstances.  This obviously was and historically has been a technique of the far left and was extremely predominant in the Nazi Party Brownshirters in the 1930’s and 1920’s. 

One lady did get a questions through however.  She did not raise her hand upright with the palm out but had here palm out with a 45 degree angle.  Her question was original, in my opinion, because that was the only question which Mr. McDermott wrote down prior to answering the question.

Next time, Mr. McDermott answer real questions.  If you really do not know the answer just say you do not know the answer.  Do not rely on Brownshirt techniques of deception.  Say the answer to a question will be included on your website. 

Duh!  Do the right thing. 

QuestionOne:  Since the Veterans Administration is collecting and permitted to selling Veterans Medical Files around the world to anyone through the University Medical system what is to stop anyone from finding out what the Minuteman Launch codes are from a Veteran who had access to them through deception medical knowledge trickery.  An example would be someone who might be allergic to peanuts and then getting the veteran drug after inserting peanuts into their food so they are weak and asking them about three or four of the launch code numbers.  This is both a national security issue and a health privacy issue. 

Question Two:  What is to prevent selling of records also in the same fashion of Military personnel to the highest bidder and getting the DNA records of the Military personnel.  A weapon currently could detect the DNA pattern and with a flip of the switch eliminate the entire force facing an enemy.  What is their to prevent this from happening.     

You see Mr. McDermott hardball questions can make a bill stronger and not weaker and at the same time strengthen our national system.  There are reason for the current system besides just money.   

Next time, stop wasting the time of 800+ american citizens or united states citizens and answer real questions.