King County Ordinance 2009-0393 Illegal

November 15, 2009

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx

All Canadian provinces have found out that the only reason someone is getting the H1N1 flu is because they have received a H1N1 vaccine immunization. The H1N1 immunization shot is a direct killer. In the United states alone over 114 children have been killed by H1N1 since April. Hungary, Ukraine, Russia, China and Japan all are either not requiring or prohibiting the H1N1 vaccination shot from being given. This is a man made disease which originated from a vile and is directly construction from the 1918 influenza virus which killed over 30 Million U.S. citizens.

Evidently the H1N1 flu virus does discriminate. It discriminates only toward those who have taken the H1N1 flu vaccination shot. Since the Baxter lab like companies are not liable would this mean that King County would be liable for any complications or injuries which beset the client recipient. In the United states Constitution “Relief in Law” must be provided and would this mean that the Congress or King County would have to pay for any complications. Perhaps this is why the Congress is pressing for Health Insurance coverage so their mistake is actually paid by the citizenry.

Also, the ordinance is not in alignment with federal statutes and it is directly unconstitutional in its ordinance. Congress has the right to all Bills referring to Naturalization. Since illegal immigrants are a Naturalization situation then and only Congress can write bills protecting illegal immigration. King County needs to have direct permission from Congress in order to have this Ordinance enforceable. Working with Congressman McDermott and Congressman Reichert and Congressman Inslee and Senator Murray and Senator Cantwell for legislation needs to be done first before any type of legislation can be passed or considered.

Also, the ordinance was illegally passed because public testimony was not completed prior to its passage at the eleven o’clock hour. Public testimony continued after the one o’clock session which I testified in. The process needs to be where the ordinance needs to be voided and re-entered with full public testimony.

No provision was giving to attempt to have the clinic clients enter into a health insurance policy thus to mitigate or reduce future expenses to the King County Clinics.

*************

 Also, I am working on a project which may decrease our King County budget by somewhere from 5% to 10% for next year. This will be due to incorrect calculations from prior year data which I have observed. Am trying to assemble the information at the present time and will be making a presentation hopefully by the end of the month. So cost saving measures need to be put into ordinance format and perhaps encouragement of people making or getting medical insurance would be a great cost saving idea. Obviously the ball is in your court. **********************************************

Thanks

Keith Ljunghammar

**************

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:16 PM, wrote:

Dear Keith,

Thank you for your email. Ordinance 2009-0393, relating to undocumented immigrants, was adopted by the Council this week. Fully consistent with federal law, the legislation adopts the current practices of King County departments, including the Sheriff’s Office, Public Health, Adult and Juvenile Detention, and the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office.

Under the legislation, all King County residents, regardless of immigration status, can now feel safe in coming forward to report crimes, assist in police investigations and seek preventive medical treatment, such as vaccinations, protecting the public at large and saving taxpayer dollars. King County is a local service provider and does not have the authority to enforce immigration laws or detain people – that is the federal government’s role.

 The Sheriff’s office has stated that they could not do their job if people were afraid to come forward as witnesses or victims. That cooperation is essential to completing effective investigations and protecting the public. With regard to public health, if an epidemic starts in a population that doesn’t have access to care, it’s only a matter of time before it spreads to everyone. Diseases like H1N1 flu don’t discriminate based on whether or not you’re a legal citizen, and therefore, restricting access to care for some hurts us all.

Therefore, providing this protection makes sense from a moral perspective, as well as an economic one. Again, thank you for your email. Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions regarding this issue or any other issue in King County.

Sincerely, Julia Patterson, District 5

Advertisements

Vaccination H1N1 Shot by Police Unconstitutional

October 7, 2009

We do not have an America Police force.  That is specifically Unconstitutional.  Only the Senate can wage war and not the President.  Only the Governor’s can invite the United States military into a state.  The President can only order the Military into a state to

 Article I, Section 8. 

 The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water:

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years:

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; …

I do not remember the Congress giving Obama the authority to round up citizens.  I do not see any insurrections from the citizens.  That is the only part here which specifically addresses the flue vaccinations in the slightest.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

 But

 Amendment III

 No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. 

 or likewise

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 or likewise

 Amendment V

 No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 or likewise

 Amendment VIII

 Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 or likewise

 Amendment IX

 The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

 Back off Jack.  You’re violating my Constitutional Rights.  Since you are acting illegally according to the Constitution then you no longer have rights delegated from the Constitution.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.      

 Show me the court order.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.      

 That is cruel and unusual punishment.  I demand my rights as a free citizen of the United states of America.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

 Sticking that needle in me is tantamount to excessive bail and excessive fines being inflicted.  By definition if you stick that needle in me I am being “inflicted”.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

 When did Congress pass this law.  What is the number of the bill.  When was it signed.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.      

Congress did not declare an “Insurrection”.  Only Congress has this power to declare an “Insurrection”.  The President does not have the Power to declare an “Insurrection”.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.        
 

I am going back into my house.  You are not to follow because I am not going to quarter you in my house.  That would be Unconstitutional.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

 You’re in my house.  Show me the law where it says that the Senate has declared “War”.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.     

What deems “Probable Cause” that you have entered my house.  Where is the Grand Jury indictment showing any relevancy of Probable Cause.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

What rules has Congress made concerning my Capture or Reprisal.  Only Congress can make these laws.  The President does not have this Power.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.  

Are you a medical doctor.  Show me your credentials.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

National Police do not have a right to vaccinate me.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

Canada does not require mandatory vaccinations.  We never do something which Canada does not do.  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

If that does not work then say:  “All hail the Obama Nation.  Put her right here!!”  OR  You are in Violation of My Constitutional Rights.  Leave right now.

END


Obama says U.S. not in Bankruptcy and indirectly proves Birth Certificate Issue still a Valid Question

September 12, 2009

With President Obama stating in his speach to the join session of Congress two days ago that if the health bill does not pass then the United States will have to file for “bankruptcy”.  What does this mean.

If we are not in bankruptcy as the above wording does positively indicate then we are out of bankruptcy.  If we were in bankruptcy then we would be dictated by a democratic or a national socialist agenda.  With not being in bankruptcy we according to our constitution must be governed by republican ideals and not democratic ideals.  And by republican vs. democratic I am not refering to a party but rather a style of government.

Under the original constitution and under a republican form of government the ideal of the constitution can be enforced.  The qualification of being a natural born citizen and proving the qualifications of such as are required.  Without being a qualified President the duties or “Acting as President” transfer to the Vice President which is Vice President Obama.

If we are in bankruptcy then we would be governed by the bankruptcy courts or the holders of credit which would be the European bankers, the Illuminaty and the Chinese government.  Unfortunately a government run by creditors would be adversarial to the continuance of a republic because this would be counter to the bankers profit motives and thus also resulting in being counter to american citizens.  As  a United States citizen we do not have a choice in the matter but as an american citizen we do have a choice in the matter.

The “You Lie” comment on the floor of the joint session of Congress was both enlightening and refreshing to hear.  We need more displays of Congressmen truly expressing their opinions and beliefs.  Only after “True Confessions” and of course balancing the budget can America heal itself and become an enduring republic once again.   

Politics and a little economic stimulus can go hand in hand if developed properly and to the goals of the citizenry.   

Maybe what our economy needs is a little bit of alternative politics instead of alternative energy.  Or perhaps the definition of alternative energy is alternative politics.  Keep that political energy going but in the direction of the american citizens benefit.


Obama’s Birth Certificate and Vice President Biden Decision

August 25, 2009
Obama’s Birth Certificate and Vice President Biden Decision

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107678

Obama’s Kenya Birth Certificate

See also, The Constitution of the united states of america, Amendment 20, Section 3 and Amendment 25, Section 4.

Amendment 20, Section 3

… If President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have

qualified.

Amendment 25, Section 4.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty- eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within Twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

So under the presumption that President Obama’s birth certificate is true and correct then the above Amendments should take full affect. The Vice President needs to step up to the plate. The other thought is that Vice President Biden needs to step up to the plate now and get a copy of the birth certificate. He needs to look at the birth certificate document and write a letter to Congress that he is taking over and Acting as President until the President can prove he was born in the “united states of america”. This of course would include Hawaii but would not include Kenya. Kenya is a British colony and has no allegiance to the u.s.a. whatsoever.

A simple proof of his right footprint and a comparison would suffice. The birth footprint could easily be looked at by the FBI or the CIA (I presume both have the proper analysis equipment and expertise available) for comparison purposes. If Mr. Obama does not want to give his footprint for verification then Congress would have to acknowledge the Kenya birth certificate. I do also believe that this birth certificate could be a complete fabrication but it is also stamped and certified as true and correct as shown on the birth certificate from a 2009 stamped certification. If Mr. Obama can release his birth certificate from Hawaii then we might have a problem. Anyone’s footprint could have been used but this could be easily verified.

Congress also needs to get their utmost attention to this matter. Is this treasonous if Congress does not move on this matter. I would say no. But if the evidence comes through and the footprint is indeed Obama’s on the birth certificate from Kenya and Congress pushes it aside anyways then I definitely would call this treasonous. Without causing a revolution then all of the citizens should vote out their local representatives no matter what party they are from. Perhaps a special Amendment to not recognize Obama as the President could arise out of each of the states legislatures. Special sessions from each state could convene. An amendment to change the Presidency would be the solution if Congress does not act and the evidence dictates to the counter.

Let’s get this issue behind us. Also, Mr. Obama needs to definitely submit his birth certificate. If you cannot submit a birth certificate and consider this as too taxing on your skill level then you are not fit to be President anyways.

Prove it!!!!!!

 

 

 


Vice President Biden should Act as President

August 16, 2009
Vice-President Biden should Act as President
 
According to the wording in the U.S. Constitution, Vice-President Biden should be “Acting as President”. Yes, no kidding. This is his duty and his right. President Obama has not shown his Birth Certificate. All his Certificate of Live Birth is proving is the eligibility of age has been accomplished.
 
It is the duty of the President elect to prove his eligibility and not for the Congress or the Court to have to guess at whether someone is “qualified” to be President or not. The wording in the Constitution is pre-supposing that the questioning of qualification for President and for Vice-President would be tested after the election process. If the testing is met prior then that is great but the Constitution only is addressing the issue of qualification after the election process has been made. The Constitution is addressing the President elect and the Vice-President elect to find out if they are qualified for the position.
Let’s get to the wording of the U.S. Constitution in Amendment 20, # 3 which was ratified on 01/23/1933. Since the first part is addressing if the President or Vice-President die I will not include that portion.
 
…., or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
 
First, let’s look at the possible sequence of events which possibly could be involved.
 
1) Has the Congress, in its infinite wisdom? as of yet established any rules or regulations in the process of defining qualification. By qualifications I am assuming, Article II, Section 1.
 
… No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
 
… Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:– “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of My Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
 
The preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States involves removing from Office those who are not qualified to be in Office. The need to proving the qualification is not up to the People to prove but up to the Officials in the various Offices to enforce by the mere heeding to the words which have been sworn to or affirmed.
Thus from the above President Obama should either prove his citizenship by providing a birth certificate showing he is a natural born citizen or remove himself from office.
 
Thus in the same manner Vice President Biden needs to ask the President for proof of citizenship and if not provided he need to produce a letter and notify the leaders of the House and the Senate and as a courtesy present the letter also to the Supreme Court Justices and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Thus after they the above have read the letter. The Constitution does not allow for a debate in this matter. The proof only is in the presentation of a birth certificate. Without a birth certificate President Obama is not a qualified President elect.
 
If I were to go to school and say I have my homework at home in a safe that only I know the combination to and then ask the teacher to give me an A++ for the homework I would be laughed at by the teacher. But if I get a note from my parents that states I did the homework and they saw me put the homework in the safe but would not be handing it in what would the teacher say. In like manner so should the citizens of the United States laugh at President Obama when he says that a note from his doctor who did not deliver him but that he is only acknowledging that after three days he say me. Wherein everyone knows that in three days one could fly half way around the world. A better comment might be that the “dog ate the homework”. In this later case then I believe the teacher would give extra time to redo the homework. Now, let’s put in another scenario. The parents are Principle and the teachers knows how the next years contract talks are going. The economy is slipping and some teachers might need to be laid off. In this scenario the student would be given an A++ with a little bit of after school verbal testing or just eliminating this from the final grade calculations.
 
Show me the Birth Certificate or get out of Office.
 
2nd. President Obama on his first day in Office and his first Executive Order was to literally put his Birth Certificate in a Safe where no one but himself had the combination to open the safe. He has made it illegal for anyone citizen to see his Birth Certificate from Hawaii. Perhaps this is because it does not exist. If I cannot have it in my hand then it does not exist is my conclusion. And if it is not in my hand then President Obama is not qualified to be President according to the Constitution.
 
Now, let’s say Vice President Biden does step up and he does become a Man and live by the Constitution. Mr. Biden does not move up to the permanent position of President. The Constitution does not allow this to happen. If a President elect is not qualified to be President then the Vice President elect moves up and Acts as President. The way I am also reading this is that the Vice President is not removed from the position as Vice President and thus he also is still the President of the Senate. Thus this would be the only time when someone would concurrently be President and Vice President. The selection of a a qualified President should then, in my opinion, go back to the candidates who ran to determine which is the next one that is qualified.
 
The qualified Presidential candidates would then be weighed by Congress and one would be put forward as determined to be qualified. I do not see any allowance here for the Electoral College process to be re-instated or for Electoral College members to be consulted. The Constitution only allows this once after the election process. The Electoral College members flunked their class in essence but no allowance for a second Electoral College group is contemplated in the Constitution.
 
So, if Mr. John McCain was entered as being the qualified President then none of the democrats would be voting for him. The democrats would also contend that Mr. McCain was not a viable qualified candidate because he was not a natural born citizen. The law for determining would be adjusted so this would not be the case. Or is the next one Mr. Ron Paul. None would be voting for him as President either. So then what actually would happen. Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
 
If nothing happens, then what could happen. Since Mr. Biden knows the above would be the results and he would in all cases remain the Vice President and the position of President would revert to someone else who would not be in alignment with his perspectives and political agenda, Mr. Biden would not enforce the 20th Amendment to the Constitution.
Let’s go to not next November but the following November after 2010. If the elections put the Democrats in a minority then the Republicans I would be assuming would be in a majority. In this scenario then Congress would force the issue and state that Mr. Obama was not the President and then force Vice President Biden to act as President as well. While the issue is being debated and fought Mr. Obama would be petitioning the Supreme Court for clarity on the situation. The Courts would state that Congress has already stated that Mr. Obama is a “natural born” citizen and the court would rest on Congresses determination. After all, the majority in the Supreme Court now is liberal leaning and this would be in their best interest. Eventually Congress would either determine that Mr. Obama needs to produce a birth certificate or they would elect a President who is qualified to the Office of President. Mr. Biden would remain the Vice President. If the Senate does not have a broad margin but rather a tight margin or a Democratic margin then in the next two years nothing will be going through the Senate to the President or to the House for signatures or for debates.
 
But after two years will this be too late to enforce a Constitutional issue to arise. It just may be. But if the economy is sour this could be the only solution. Perhaps at that point the People may demand this Constitutional question. This question could also be a debating point in the November 2010 election process. “Show me the Birth Certificate”. Could this be the 2010 Cry. Freedom is precious, let’s preserve it.
 
Mr. Biden what are you going to do. If you have not seen the Birth Certificate then enforce the Constitution. After all, you did swear that you would.
 
“So help you God.”

 


Bill of Rights – Guarantees Rights of Individuals only and not the States

July 28, 2009

Concerning the Bill of Rights.

The total essence of the Bill of Rights was established for Individuals and not the State nor for the federal government.

 As an example:

 If with the 1st Amendment I am concerned about the State and the free exercise and the non-establishment thereof, etc. then the argument could be made to believe that the separation of Church and State does need to be in Existence.  But if the argument see below for with the individual.

 Again, with the 2nd Amendment the argument commonly argued is that the State has a Right to form a Militia for its own defenses.

But if the Bill of Rights was for the State then in the U.S. Constitution would not of had to state that all other rights are reserved for the State.  Yes, the U.S. Constitution was addressed first but before the U.S. Constitution could be ratified the guaranteeing of individual rights were ratified.  It would have been completely unnecessary and duplicity of efforts to include as an amendment the 10 Rights because they were already covered.  If not a Right or Duty of the Federal then it is of the States or still reserved for the People.  So then the only logical and I do not know why it has not been addressed before the Supreme Court in this fashion previously reasoned. 

 What I think needs to be done is to get copies of logic in the Post Revolutionary timeframe and specifically of our founders to see if their speech is directed toward the States or to the Individuals.  Logic would then dictate it was directed toward the individual and not toward the State.

 What do you think about this.

 END


U.S. Constitution and California Territory

July 18, 2009

Dear Washington State Congressional Delegation

Subject:  Constitution in relationship to California now being a Territory and not a State/they violated the Constitution for the requirement to remain a State.

California has to be a territory and not a State.  Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states:

“No State shall . . . emit any bills of credit . . . .”

This is one thing which was happening rampantly in the Pre-Revolutionary timeframe.   On an insistance by John Adams and by James Madison and knowing that emitting a bill of credit was extremely disruptive to commerce and personal business transaction this was a requirement which was included into the U.S. Constitution.  I as of yet am unable to see what King George was doing with this same technique.  If I were to read the Declaration of Indepence I am sure I would also see this type of transaction pre-eminant in King George’s time.  This could have been due partially because of the time travel consequences.  Our immediate cashing of checks via electronics eliminates this as a necessity.

Starting on July 2, 2009, IOU’s from California were submitted for payment to vendors.  This is extremely disruptive to the economy – state and national.

You need to stand up on the floor of the House and immediately demand that all California Representative step down out of the House since they are not to be represented in the House since they are no longer a “State” because their state has violated the U.S. Constitution in Article I, Section 10. 

1) California then as a Territory can collect all equivalent federal monies to balance their budget and then request permission to reenter as a State.  Their budget should be balanced within a few months time. 

2)  This would immediately change the balance of power in the House if some of the Blue Dogs want to vote with the Republicans.

3)  This huge spending mix will stop immediately.

4)  Otherwise, welfare recipients and illegal immigrants will come to Washington State and sign up for welfare and other Washington State benefits because we have the lowest residency requirements and the highest welfare payout amount.  The next closest state with better benefits would be New York State but the traveling distance is greater.

5)  Our State budget would go from $9 Billion to maybe $20 Billion over budget instantly for the biennium.

6)  The other solution would be for the federal government to bail out California from their $26 Billion deficit projection and thus eliminating the continuing process of a IOU program for California taxpayers.

Please advise as to what you will be doing.  Please announce this on the Floor of the House immediately.  A Point of Order statement on the Floor takes precedence over all other orders of business.  This is a Constitutional issue and their is another time when disruption in the House happened.  This was prior to the Civil War and all of the South left and President Lincoln ordered troops to arrest and jail all members of Congress who would not meet in the House.   Then another time was when General Washington saw a problem with the Confederation of the United States.  The next step if the Constitution cannot be abided by might be that the military General for the Army to take control.  This is his duty if he sees that the U.S. Constitution is being violated.   A legal coupe if you will.  Let’s follow the Constitution and avoid having our Army General called to his responsibility of “Protecting and Defending the Constitution” as is his sworn duty before God and Country.  If the Four Star General does not do this then the Three Star General must arrest all other Three and Four Star Generals and do the same.  If not then are we going to proceed down to a Private performing this duty.

Please advise.