Will make an explanation after each one of the Articles or Sections.
1) Article IV, Section 4.
Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.
This can be a little bit tricky sometimes in its interpretation. For the meaning of a Republican Form of Government this would essentially mean that no State government could transform its government style to a Democratic, Socialist, or Communistic, or Fascist Form of government or other no conceived of at the time of the forming of the Republic. This in my intepretation means that Jodge Sotomayer cannot be elected because this would be interferring in this interpretation. But another way of reading this is that the U.S Government has to be a Republican in form type of Governement. It could also mean that the U.S. Govenment will come in an force a State to revert back to a Republican Form of Government. No special interest or Nobilities can be created. No Democrat style of government can be created. Voting must be guaranteed.
All states must be protected from Invasion from without the Countries borders and from within. If a disturbance would come from another State then the federal government would step in to settle the disagreement. If an Invasion would come from the Federal Borders then the Federal Government would have to come in to stop the problem.
This would also mean that if the Legislature of the Executive branches of government could not convene then the Federal Government would step in and take over to get the State government back to a Republican Form of Government.
2) Article VI
… both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to Support this Constitution…
This part of the Constitution does not seem to be working at this time. To protect the Constitution of Article IV, Section 4. Well, I do see Invasion from outside forces at this time. If we have 850,000 illegal immigrants with 500,000 staying each year then this is an Invasion. The federal government needs to be stepping in and squelching this Invasion.
3) Article I, Section 8.
… to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…
Each State has its own Militia. The States could provide its own Defence if the Federal Government does not step in to do this. Overpowering and setting up Habeas Corpes could be instituted to round-up all of the illegal immigrants.
4) To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on th esubject of Bankrupties throughout the United States.
The establishment of a uniform Rule of Naturalization has been established. But we need enforcement of these rules as well. This is where the federal government is lacking in is enforcement. This is really the job of the Executive Branch.
5) To provide for calling for the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions:
This would be just a wording of what was being stated above and who has the responsibility to do the enforcement.
6) The Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Casees of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
Evidently we have had a need for Writ of Habeas Corpus suspension 500,000 per year for each of the last dozen years and more to get the borders guarded.
7) Article II, Section 1.
…will to the best of my Ability, preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
If the President is not Defending the Constitution then he should be Impeached so someone that wants to defend the Constitution will be the President. Unfortunately this illegal immigrant mismanagement goes along ways. But at least let’s start to enforce this provision now.
My conclusions on this are that the U.S. Constitution has been badly hammered and is waiting for someone or some President to enforce the Constitution. The problem of illegal immigration is not just a casual affair. The strong wording of GUARANTEE is not just a warrantee but a GUARANTEE. The gentlemen farmer who was on the U.S./Mexican border was not being GUARANTEED his property rights because the U.S. Government was not GUARANTEEing the Constitution are required by the Constitution. Perhaps on the border there is a different Constitution?
See also I-1043 RespectWashington.us