Obama has cancer and will rest around Christmas

President Obama has cancer.  This story was broken by SCAN TV on All Day Live over three weeks ago by Dr. Mount.  The Globe newspaper just printed the news today.

Obama’s addition to cigarettes is finally taking affect on his body.  He has:

1)  Cancer in the bottom of his lungs and it is migrating.

2)  The cause is from a chemical irritation of the tar from cigarette smoking.  The chemical irritation will require Kemo Therapy and about eight weeks at this time.

3)  Presidebt Obama does not eat well and need to modify his diet significantly.

4)  The President is nutrient deficient. 

Also, President Obama will or should be taking a vacation around one week prior to Christmas.

The above was transposed from a conversation with Dr. Mount.

The question is will Vice President Biden now beccome the acting President during these particular times of difficulty for the President.

President Obama steps down to Chairman of UN Security Council Post

President Obama on November 2nd, 2009 has been forced to step down as President of the United states of America. 

His post for being the Chairman of the United Nations Security Council post will last one month.  Mr. Obama will resume his duties as President of the United states of America following his one month tenure with the United Nations. 

During this time, as per the United states Constitution, Vice President Biden will be the acting President and will assume all roles as signing of bills and as the Commander in Chief of all Armed Forces of the United states and of the United states Navy. 

This action has not been done previously by any acting President but the United states Constitution mandates the procedure for a President who assumes another post by any other foreign nation or organization such as the United Nations. 

Normally Congress and only Congress would have the power to acknowledge and permit a seated President from accepting and acting in another United states government post.  However, since the post has not been authorized by the Congress this thus means that Mr. Obama must and has given up his duties as President. 

Normally the President would appoint an Ambassador to fill this post.  Interviews for acceptance and acknowledgement of skills by Congress must be made.  Congress must approve all Ambassadors except when Congress i s not in session then the President can appoint an Ambassador to fill the post until Congress next comes into Session.

Mr. Obama, I hope you enjoy your stay at the United Nations and enjoy New York at the same time.

Perhaps the Queen of England may get upset at a President or other head of state being able to direct her troops at will. 

END      

 

Obama’s Birth Certificate and Vice President Biden Decision

Obama’s Birth Certificate and Vice President Biden Decision

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107678

Obama’s Kenya Birth Certificate

See also, The Constitution of the united states of america, Amendment 20, Section 3 and Amendment 25, Section 4.

Amendment 20, Section 3

… If President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have

qualified.

Amendment 25, Section 4.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty- eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within Twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

So under the presumption that President Obama’s birth certificate is true and correct then the above Amendments should take full affect. The Vice President needs to step up to the plate. The other thought is that Vice President Biden needs to step up to the plate now and get a copy of the birth certificate. He needs to look at the birth certificate document and write a letter to Congress that he is taking over and Acting as President until the President can prove he was born in the “united states of america”. This of course would include Hawaii but would not include Kenya. Kenya is a British colony and has no allegiance to the u.s.a. whatsoever.

A simple proof of his right footprint and a comparison would suffice. The birth footprint could easily be looked at by the FBI or the CIA (I presume both have the proper analysis equipment and expertise available) for comparison purposes. If Mr. Obama does not want to give his footprint for verification then Congress would have to acknowledge the Kenya birth certificate. I do also believe that this birth certificate could be a complete fabrication but it is also stamped and certified as true and correct as shown on the birth certificate from a 2009 stamped certification. If Mr. Obama can release his birth certificate from Hawaii then we might have a problem. Anyone’s footprint could have been used but this could be easily verified.

Congress also needs to get their utmost attention to this matter. Is this treasonous if Congress does not move on this matter. I would say no. But if the evidence comes through and the footprint is indeed Obama’s on the birth certificate from Kenya and Congress pushes it aside anyways then I definitely would call this treasonous. Without causing a revolution then all of the citizens should vote out their local representatives no matter what party they are from. Perhaps a special Amendment to not recognize Obama as the President could arise out of each of the states legislatures. Special sessions from each state could convene. An amendment to change the Presidency would be the solution if Congress does not act and the evidence dictates to the counter.

Let’s get this issue behind us. Also, Mr. Obama needs to definitely submit his birth certificate. If you cannot submit a birth certificate and consider this as too taxing on your skill level then you are not fit to be President anyways.

Prove it!!!!!!

 

　

 

Vice President Biden should Act as President

Vice-President Biden should Act as President
 
According to the wording in the U.S. Constitution, Vice-President Biden should be “Acting as President”. Yes, no kidding. This is his duty and his right. President Obama has not shown his Birth Certificate. All his Certificate of Live Birth is proving is the eligibility of age has been accomplished.
 
It is the duty of the President elect to prove his eligibility and not for the Congress or the Court to have to guess at whether someone is “qualified” to be President or not. The wording in the Constitution is pre-supposing that the questioning of qualification for President and for Vice-President would be tested after the election process. If the testing is met prior then that is great but the Constitution only is addressing the issue of qualification after the election process has been made. The Constitution is addressing the President elect and the Vice-President elect to find out if they are qualified for the position.
Let’s get to the wording of the U.S. Constitution in Amendment 20, # 3 which was ratified on 01/23/1933. Since the first part is addressing if the President or Vice-President die I will not include that portion.
 
…., or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
 
First, let’s look at the possible sequence of events which possibly could be involved.
 
1) Has the Congress, in its infinite wisdom? as of yet established any rules or regulations in the process of defining qualification. By qualifications I am assuming, Article II, Section 1.
 
… No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
 
… Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:– “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of My Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
 
The preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States involves removing from Office those who are not qualified to be in Office. The need to proving the qualification is not up to the People to prove but up to the Officials in the various Offices to enforce by the mere heeding to the words which have been sworn to or affirmed.
Thus from the above President Obama should either prove his citizenship by providing a birth certificate showing he is a natural born citizen or remove himself from office.
 
Thus in the same manner Vice President Biden needs to ask the President for proof of citizenship and if not provided he need to produce a letter and notify the leaders of the House and the Senate and as a courtesy present the letter also to the Supreme Court Justices and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Thus after they the above have read the letter. The Constitution does not allow for a debate in this matter. The proof only is in the presentation of a birth certificate. Without a birth certificate President Obama is not a qualified President elect.
 
If I were to go to school and say I have my homework at home in a safe that only I know the combination to and then ask the teacher to give me an A++ for the homework I would be laughed at by the teacher. But if I get a note from my parents that states I did the homework and they saw me put the homework in the safe but would not be handing it in what would the teacher say. In like manner so should the citizens of the United States laugh at President Obama when he says that a note from his doctor who did not deliver him but that he is only acknowledging that after three days he say me. Wherein everyone knows that in three days one could fly half way around the world. A better comment might be that the “dog ate the homework”. In this later case then I believe the teacher would give extra time to redo the homework. Now, let’s put in another scenario. The parents are Principle and the teachers knows how the next years contract talks are going. The economy is slipping and some teachers might need to be laid off. In this scenario the student would be given an A++ with a little bit of after school verbal testing or just eliminating this from the final grade calculations.
 
Show me the Birth Certificate or get out of Office.
 
2nd. President Obama on his first day in Office and his first Executive Order was to literally put his Birth Certificate in a Safe where no one but himself had the combination to open the safe. He has made it illegal for anyone citizen to see his Birth Certificate from Hawaii. Perhaps this is because it does not exist. If I cannot have it in my hand then it does not exist is my conclusion. And if it is not in my hand then President Obama is not qualified to be President according to the Constitution.
 
Now, let’s say Vice President Biden does step up and he does become a Man and live by the Constitution. Mr. Biden does not move up to the permanent position of President. The Constitution does not allow this to happen. If a President elect is not qualified to be President then the Vice President elect moves up and Acts as President. The way I am also reading this is that the Vice President is not removed from the position as Vice President and thus he also is still the President of the Senate. Thus this would be the only time when someone would concurrently be President and Vice President. The selection of a a qualified President should then, in my opinion, go back to the candidates who ran to determine which is the next one that is qualified.
 
The qualified Presidential candidates would then be weighed by Congress and one would be put forward as determined to be qualified. I do not see any allowance here for the Electoral College process to be re-instated or for Electoral College members to be consulted. The Constitution only allows this once after the election process. The Electoral College members flunked their class in essence but no allowance for a second Electoral College group is contemplated in the Constitution.
 
So, if Mr. John McCain was entered as being the qualified President then none of the democrats would be voting for him. The democrats would also contend that Mr. McCain was not a viable qualified candidate because he was not a natural born citizen. The law for determining would be adjusted so this would not be the case. Or is the next one Mr. Ron Paul. None would be voting for him as President either. So then what actually would happen. Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
 
If nothing happens, then what could happen. Since Mr. Biden knows the above would be the results and he would in all cases remain the Vice President and the position of President would revert to someone else who would not be in alignment with his perspectives and political agenda, Mr. Biden would not enforce the 20th Amendment to the Constitution.
Let’s go to not next November but the following November after 2010. If the elections put the Democrats in a minority then the Republicans I would be assuming would be in a majority. In this scenario then Congress would force the issue and state that Mr. Obama was not the President and then force Vice President Biden to act as President as well. While the issue is being debated and fought Mr. Obama would be petitioning the Supreme Court for clarity on the situation. The Courts would state that Congress has already stated that Mr. Obama is a “natural born” citizen and the court would rest on Congresses determination. After all, the majority in the Supreme Court now is liberal leaning and this would be in their best interest. Eventually Congress would either determine that Mr. Obama needs to produce a birth certificate or they would elect a President who is qualified to the Office of President. Mr. Biden would remain the Vice President. If the Senate does not have a broad margin but rather a tight margin or a Democratic margin then in the next two years nothing will be going through the Senate to the President or to the House for signatures or for debates.
 
But after two years will this be too late to enforce a Constitutional issue to arise. It just may be. But if the economy is sour this could be the only solution. Perhaps at that point the People may demand this Constitutional question. This question could also be a debating point in the November 2010 election process. “Show me the Birth Certificate”. Could this be the 2010 Cry. Freedom is precious, let’s preserve it.
 
Mr. Biden what are you going to do. If you have not seen the Birth Certificate then enforce the Constitution. After all, you did swear that you would.
 
“So help you God.”

 

Still to do/Illegal immigrants/junker credit

I still need to follow up on the old junkers and the economic stimulus which they could help with.

Also, with reading the U.S. Constitution there is an article in one of the San Francisco newspapers about illegal immigrants and loopholes in the law for underage illegals who commit crimes.

The U.S. Constitution specifically holds these laws to their creation only by the Congress and enforceable by the President via the Militia.  Either the State or the using of the State Militia by the President to enforce ALL laws pertaining to naturalization.  I will spell out later specifically what I am refering to.  Have to get to a meeting 44 miles away and the traffic is usually bad to leaving at 4 to go 44 miles and be there at 6 p.m. 

This illegal immigrant thing is out of hand.

See my post about the King County Council and proposed ordinance 209-0393 and the reference to line 9 and below this is a reference to the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8 and wording relating to naturalization.  aka illegal immigrants and/or undocumented aliens.

Unconstitutional – VOTEing Rights

Unconstitutional – VOTEing rights.

The way I am reading the Constitution I do not see why EX-Convicts cannot vote right away. Do I agree with this. No. But it is the way the U.S. Constitution reads. Please advise if I am wrong.

Article XIV, Section 1.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United State and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Article XV, Section 1.

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Previous condition of servitude here means incarcerated. See Article XIII Section 1. I would interpret this to mean while in the slammer and also under house arrest and also while under parole.

Article XXIV, Section 1

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the Untied States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

My question on this is the questioning of what a tax is. If a tax is someone having to pay restitution then having to pay restitution prior to having your voting rights restored would be unconstitutional by definition.

Article XIII, Section 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly conviced, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to its jurisdiction.

This define what involuntary servitude is supposed to mean in todays terms since it was more extension back in the writting of the Constitution.

So for my conclusion. I have the definition as from the Constitution as to how long the condition of servitude is supposed to last which is until the end of parole. Article XV, Section 1 also limits restrictions on voting to not be denied because of previous condition of servitude.

If one would complain about this then in the States the condition of restitution can still be maintained but a different and separate role for voting of U.S. candidates must be upheld. If “other tax” is not interpreted as from above then this condition must be changed because it directly includes States in the requirement of conditions.

Is this just politics or what.  Is this a sign of the times to reject the Constitution of is this country acting like a Democracy and not like a Republic which it is “guaranteed” to act like as per the Constitution. 

Or is the only solution to Impeach the President so this can be enforced by the next President.   A softer approach would be for the Attorney General of the U.S. and the several States to enforce this provision by demanding the President and respective Governors to call the Congress or Legislature back to enforce this provision in the Constitution.  The President could enforce this without the Legislatures by the State Executive changing the provision.  But it would be less of a headache if the Legislatures are called back into session. 

See also I-1043

END

 

Arrogant – U.S. Obama or Mao

Oct. 2, 1950 – Beijing: Mao notifies Stalin that China will fight US in Korea – “We are going to dispatch Chinese troops to Korea under the name of a Volunteer Force to fight the US Imperialists and Syngman Rhee’s armed forces, side by side with our comrades, the North Korean forces. The reasons we are sending Chinese troops to Korea are that, if the US occupies the Korean peninsula, the Korean revolutionary forces would be completely removed, the US Imperialists would become more

belligerent and arrogant,

 and it would result in a situation unfavorable to China.” Mao requests that Stalin provide air and logistical supports. Stalin agrees to equip 100 Chinese divisions and send two Soviet air force divisions to Manchuria. Mao and Stalin agree that October 15 is the day to start the operation across the Yalu.

If President Obama senses that the United States is arrogant then he needs to reflect back to Mao concerning the Korean War.  Perhaps Mr. Obama was quoting Mao when addressing comments in European countries last month. 

Mr. Obama, in case you do not realize, aggression by the United States is not arrogant but rather protectionists of our allies.  Are you still fighting a war in North Korea?  Are you a sympathizers to the former Chinese government. 

Apologies for arrogance have never been needed when one is defending freedom.  Are you going to first apologize to an aggressor if they attack our interests and our country. 

Please advise. 

I would rather say that now when push comes to shove China would ask the United States for her help if North Korea tried to tickle China’s nose.   Put another way, China would align itself immediately if foot-stomping was to occur in North Korea.  Mr. President, do not forget that “freedom” is a powerful word and alignments can occur when the universal threat of “loss of freedom” raises its “belligerent and arrogant” head. 

Defending freedom is not arrogance.

HB 1350 – Election by Popular Vote for President

HB 1350 – Election by Popular Vote for President

This idea will weaken the smaller states power and legislative aspirations considerably. The President of the United States would only need to cater to the larger states for a re-election campaign. Also, objectives of a sitting President and favour would only cater to larger states. Since Washington State really is somewhere in the middle then the direction of the voters for political purposes would narrowly count. Middle low population states needs such as Alaska’s need to driling in Anware would be relegated to the back row. Only if the resource comes to the national front line would Alaska be recognized or if a representative of the state was re-elected too numberous times to count on one hand then that state might be recognized due to the offsetting power of the legislator and not due to the power of the President. Middle low population states would become political dustbowls and the wind would scatter to the large population states.

The founding fathers knew the correctness of state division and the political affect which a popular vote would create. Also, political characteristics of individual states would have to mask or scew the political landscape of the expected President of incumbent President for things to get done or not to get done in a particular state. Politics would work both ways if a state had a wide swing. For neutral swingers perhaps no favours would be earned during a campaign and afterwards. Only the Congressional and Senatorial politicians would have the ultimate power in neutral states. Two year middle terms could swing dramatically due to the perceived continuance or non-continuance of the current or incumbent President.

A new array and is the difference really that much.

One state could require a complete recount of all voters in all states.

I think this one is too close to call.